Alta Vista Logo Orb


Mind Field...      
Vol. 7, No. 1  Jan.-Feb. 1989

 

THE DOCTRINE OF CREATION AND THE SCARCITY OF PRAISE

The Book of Psalms contains some curious contrasts. One of them is the odd coupling of complaint and praise. The psalmist is often overwhelmed by his problems. He complains about his enemies, his troubles, and his feeling that God has forgotten or deserted him. On the other hand, he is filled with thankfulness and praise to God, and he calls all of the creation to share with him in his exercise of homage to the Lord. It is in this latter aspect which serves as a starting point for the topic of this issue of The Mind Field.
Praise occupies a very large place in the Psalms. The Psalms take up a relatively small part of the Bible, but they express a prominent aspect of the life of godly Old Testament Hebrews. The Hebrews were not fond of logic and philosophy as the Greeks were; they were, however, intensely interested in a personal. emotional, aesthetic communion with the living God who had made Himself known to them in the awesome experiences at the Red Sea and Mount Sinai. The result was that the inner life of God’s ancient servant was characterized by an overflowing expression of praise and thanks to Him. As an indicator of the quality of life of the Hebrews, the Psalms assume a much more important place than their comparative size in the sacred rolls would suggest. And they give evidence that praise was a large, delightful portion of that life. The New Testament continues the theme. In the Book of Revelation it rises to a veritable crescendo in songs and sayings of 5:9-14 and in the Song of Moses and the Lamb in 15:3-4. Praise and thanksgiving pour out like a mighty waterfall out of the pages of the Bible and the lives of its people.
By contrast, praise has shrunk to trickle in the life of the church in the West today. It occurs in Sunday worship, prayer meetings, and praise meetings. Undoubtedly it occurs in the ordinary lives of God’s people, but one can probably be granted the generalization that in our fast-paced, high-tech culture it occupies a very minor place compared to the Biblical standard. Perhaps the change has something to do with our doctrine of creation. Let’s see if we can support such a suggestion.

THE SCARCITY OF PRAISE

Listen for a moment to the calls for and characterization of praise in the Psalms. "I will bless Jehovah at all times: His praise shall continually be in my mouth . . . Oh magnify Jehovah with me, and let us exalt His name together." (Psalm 34:1,3) "My mouth shall be filled with thy praise, and with thy honor all the day. . . But I will hope continually, and will praise thee yet more and more." (Psalm 71:8,14) "Enter into His gates with thanksgiving, and into His courts with praise: give thanks unto Him, and bless His name." (Psalm 100:4) "Who can utter the mighty acts of Jehovah, or show forth all his praise?" (Psalm 106:2) "One generation shall laud thy works to another, and shall declare thy mighty acts . . . And men shall speak of the might of thy terrible acts; and I will declare thy greatness. . . All thy works shall give thanks unto thee, O Jehovah; and thy saints shall bless thee. They shall speak of the glory of thy kingdom, and talk of thy power." (Psalm 145:4,6,10-11) "Praise ye Jehovah . . . all his angels. . . all his host. . . sun and moon . . . sea-monsters, and all deeps; fire and hail, snow. . . wind. . . mountains. . . trees. . . . beasts. . . birds. . . kings . . . and all peoples; princes and all judges of the earth. . ." (Psalm 148:1-11)
Clearly, praise was a major part of life for the godly in the Old Testament times. As Geraldine Steensma puts it, "Every event was understood as an act of God or of men who acted either obediently or disobediently to a living, powerful God of grace and love." (see footnote 1) Not only events, but created things as well were seen as revelatory of God and thus as calling on people for a response to Him. The response meant living in righteousness and justice; it also meant giving praise and thanks to Him. Psalm 148 calls on every created thing, from stars to fish, to praise the Lord, but created things have neither words to use nor hearts to understand the meaning of praise. Clearly, the psalmist is calling on people to perceive God’s self-revelation in the creation and respond by praising Him.
The praises of the church today in the Western world occupy a much narrower band. We praise God for our salvation, including the forgiveness of sin and the engrafting into God’s family in Christ. We thank Him for His care and for the answers to our prayers. We thank Him for the promise of Christ’s Second Coming and the reconciliation of all things. But our praise is located largely in the "spiritual" area of our lives; ordinary events and created things do not normally move us to praise. A breath-taking sunset or a spectacular answer to prayer may prompt us to give thanks, but that would be the exception rather than the rule.
Something has happened to praise. Created things and events have become "nature" for us, and "nature" doesn’t call for praise. It is simply something to be mastered and utilized for our own pleasure and convenience. The scarcity of praise today is doubtless due to a number of factors; the one we want to look at particularly in the essay is the impact of our modern Christian doctrine of creation.

THE MODERN DOCTRINE OF CREATION

Technically, the Christian doctrine of creation is the same today as it has always been. We assume that when we say the Apostle’s Creed we mean the same thing by creation as the early fathers did. We should subscribe to what the creeds of the reformation say about God’s continued, powerful maintenance of His created world. But we forget that words change meaning in the light of changing cultures and that our interpretation of "creation" has been deeply altered by Enlightenment thought. Modern people have learned to separate "facts" from their meaning or value. They think of truth as "objective," which means that something "out there" like the actions on a theater stage rather than something which calls on us for a personal, relational response. We too, are modern people, and the fact that we use ancient creeds does not mean that we understand them in the way the ancients did. As a result, there are at least three ways in which our contemporary doctrine falls short of the Biblical one.

1. Static rather than dynamic.

We tend to think of creation as something God did at the beginning rather than something He is continuing to do today. It is more like the winding of a clock or the lighting of a candle than the moving of a foot treadle on a sewing machine or a potter’s wheel. There was a tremendous power and activity involved at the beginning, but since then, things move along under the control of "natural laws" with which even God is not allowed to interfere. Mysteriously, but powerfully, the regularities which scientific investigation has discovered in God’s world have taken on a life of their own. As Newbiggin puts it, "nature" has taken the place of God. For us who still believe in a living God, He has been, for practical purposes, removed to a great distance. He gave creation its original push, but since then it has been running on its own. We are very much like the 18th century deists. The God we believe in plays no large part in the ordinary events or objects of our daily lives.

2. Distant rather than immediate.

To believe in creation in the 20th century has been reduced almost completely to arguing with evolutionists over how the world got started. We insist that God started the whole thing, and we go to great lengths to prove that the evolutionary theory doesn’t satisfactorily explain the way the world is. But this leaves God, in His relation to the everyday world of work and play, at a great distance from us. Immediate contact with Him comes in prayer and worship, singing and fellowshipping with other believers, but the world goes on its way for us almost as independently of God as it does for non-Christians.

3. Private rather than public.

We live in a world where "facts" are public, values or meanings are private. The former are absolute, until science changes them by new discoveries; the latter are relative. This change, which began with the dawn of the scientific revolution about 1600 AD, has now become very powerful. It is responsible, among a host of other things, for the "new morality" of the late 20th century. One may not question the scientific facts; and one may not impose one’s own values on anyone else. As a result, the doctrine of creation, which lies in the realm of values or meanings and outside the area capable of scientific demonstration, is something that Christians find very difficult to introduce into conversation with secular people. One may believe in creation if one cares to, but it is totally irrelevant to matter of business, education, politics, or the media. One is neither polite nor considerate to introduce it into conversation on those subjects. Worse yet, it has no meaning for the secular mind. It does not enter into a rational discussion of the real problems or situations in the world.

THE BIBLICAL DOCTRINE

By contrast, creation in the Bible is dynamic, immediate, and public. It is dynamic because in Jesus Christ all things "hold together" (Colossians 1:17). He "upholds all things by the Word of his Power." (Hebrews 1:3) The power that drives an internal combustion engine or the rocket motors of a space ship is the power of Jesus Christ. God is powerfully at work in the world, not only maintaining the old creation in the brokenness that is the result of human sin, but also moving toward the re-creation of His entire world. He is effecting this new creation now in the hearts of His people; ultimately He will do it in the entire environment. This is the work of His grace, based on Christ’s death and resurrection.
od is not a god at a distance; He is immediately present. The sun rises and sets, the rains come to nourish the crop, our bodies function and our food digests, all at the Word of the Lord. The entire ordering of ordinary human life is the work of God. It is crafted this way in order to talk to us of Him, and it calls upon us to respond to him in every experience and every activity of our lives. Jonathan Edwards put it this way: "God’s preserving created things in being is perfectly equivalent to a continued creation, or to his creating those things out of nothing at each moment of their existence." (See footnote 2) There is nothing distant about that! "In Him we live and move and have our being." (Acts 17:28)
Nor is the Biblical doctrine of creation a private matter, interesting and important to its devotees, but irrelevant to the ongoing world and its affairs. That world, with its stock markets, its airports and train stations, it’s farms, factories and stores, its houses and cities - the whole amazing arrangement would simply disappear if God were for one moment to withhold His sustaining Word of power. That can hardly be a private, irrelevant to public affairs, and we have consented to act as though that were the way things are. Now it is not easy to re-introduce the concept of God’s relevance in the public sphere. It will take some inspired imagination on our part and the powerful work of the Holy Spirit, but it must be done.

TWO SETS OF CONSEQUENCES

From these two differing views of creation flow two different sets of consequences. The modern views of creation, on which the church acts even while it uses the words of the Biblical one and claims to believe them, has effectively closed down on the fountain of praise. A world of natural laws offers no stimulation to praise. It has largely throttled thankfulness in the ordinary lives of believers. If God takes away our headache in answer to prayer, we thank Him, but if we take aspirin and the pain ceases, we tend to credit the medicine and forget the Lord. Ordinary affairs like going to sleep at night cease to be occasions for communion with God; they are simply the result of tired cells and "nature" will restore our vitality through sleep.
A Biblical view of creation, on the other hand, has dramatically different results. The more we realize that it is the Word of the Lord which sustains the entire creation and our lives in it, and that the Lord is talking to us in the ordinary events and affairs of our daily lives, the more praise and thanksgiving well up in our hearts. When we realize that the beauty of the sunset is not in the sunset, but in God’s beauty coming to us through the sunset, it is impossible to keep from thanking Him. Furthermore, our daily activities become offerings to God (Romans 12:1-2), and our fellowship with Him. They become offerings to God (Romans 12:1-2), and our fellowship with Him is infinitely enriched as it spreads through the common duties and actions of our lives. Eating and drinking, working and resting, loving and caring for one another - these can all be avenues of communion with God. That is what He created them for. That is what Christ died and rose to provide for us. Finally our witness to the world will be altered as we recover a Biblical understanding of the creation in which we live and work. Our witness will no longer be a "spiritual" message unrelated to a secular world. It will become a message with integrity and power because it recognizes the immediacy of God’s presence in the ordinary world and brings to bear upon that world the rich meaning of Christ’s death and resurrection.
So if we want praise to flourish again in our lives, we need to recover a Biblical doctrine of creation. It will not be easy or instant, but it promises rich results in our lives and our witness.

Editor: Al Greene
Alta Vista College

 Footnotes:

1. Steensma, G. & Van Brummelen,
         H., Shaping School Curriculum,
         Signal, 1977, pg 4.

2. Owens, Virginia Stem, God Spy,
        Alta Vista College Press, 1988,
        page 58.

Alta Vista
1719 NE 50th Street
Seattle, Washington 98105

Phone: (206) 524-2262
Fax: (206) 524-1837

Email | Home